CONCLUSIONS: Evidence of compensatory scanning suggests a proactive, top-down mechanism driving gaze in HH. The presence of spatial neglect (SN) appeared to negatively impact the top-down process.

CONCLUSIONS: FEA simulation results conformed to the experimentally observed trend, further supporting the proof of concept and design parameters. This is the first viable approach in human patients with proof of concept for complete reanimation of a bidirectionally paretic eyelid. Further study is warranted to refine the prototype and determine the feasibility and safety of prolonged use.

CONCLUSIONS: Angular translation provided adjustable force, which had a statistically and clinically meaningful impact on eye opening and the completeness of the spontaneous blink. This quantitative evidence supports continued use of the angular translation mechanism for force adjustment in the customizable magnetic correction of severe blepharoptosis.

CONCLUSIONS: All groups demonstrated compensatory scanning, making more gaze scans with larger magnitudes to the blind side. Mild to moderate LHSN adversely impacted the scanning rate.

CONCLUSIONS: This clinical report suggests that the main barriers to clinical success of the MLP may be cost and insurance coverage, appearance of the device, and self-application. Possible solutions are cost-benefit analysis research, engineering efforts to reduce spectacle magnet size and improve the ease of eyelid magnet application.

CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary results suggest that the an aMLP can correct ptosis without adversely affecting blink function. Further evaluation in a larger patient population is warranted.

CONCLUSIONS: Data support the feasibility of this inpatient eye and vision rehabilitation care pathway which may be used as a foundation for creating or refining similar programs elsewhere. Uniform administration of IRF-based visual neuro-rehabilitation care could provide a substrate for future clinical trials to evaluate efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS: P-prisms improved detection, but collision judgments were inaccurate when seen only via the p-prisms and did not improve with perceptual-motor training. Patients should continue to be advised to turn their head and eyes to fixate the hazard after detection.

CONCLUSIONS: The three-dimensional custom MLP frame generation approach using a smartphone app-based craniofacial scan is a feasible approach for clinical deployment of the MLP.

CONCLUSIONS: In patients complaining of blurry vision, a careful evaluation of the stability of accommodation is indicated.

CONCLUSIONS: The virtual vision clinic process improved inpatient access to eye and visual neurorehabilitation assessment before and during the COVID-19 quarantine and was well accepted by providers and patients.

CONCLUSIONS: The minimum angular resolution in logMAR of current VR technology is insufficient for visual acuity testing and may be insufficient for standalone treatment of amblyopia. Field of view during movie watching or gaming is about half that reported by manufacturers but adequate for some types of visual field testing. Use for vergence testing and training is a concern for headsets with long eye-to-screen distance or interpupillary distances

CONCLUSIONS: Within the controlled conditions of this simulated, collision judgment task, patients with left neglect responded well to initial application of p-prisms exhibiting improved detection and wider safety margins on the side of the HVFD that did not differ from non-neglect patients. Further study of p-prisms for neglect patients in free-gaze conditions after extended wear and in real-world mobility tasks is clearly warranted.

CONCLUSIONS: The MLP is safe and feasible for temporary correction of severe ptosis.

CONCLUSIONS: P-prisms improved detection with no negative effects, and training may provide additional benefit.

CONCLUSIONS: Because more peripheral parts of the visual field increasingly project to the contralateral superior colliculus with the temporal crescent being entirely contralateral, avoiding patching of the temporal crescent was advised, and in most cases can be achieved by taping off the spectacle lens and avoiding an elastic eye patch.

Visual impairments are common after traumatic brain injury (TBI) and negatively affect quality of life. We describe a 39-year-old woman with a severe TBI who was evaluated by the inpatient optometry and vision rehabilitation service with findings of complete right homonymous hemianopia and right cranial nerve III palsy with 30-degree right exotropia (eye turn out) and complete right ptosis (eyelid will not open). The 30-degree exotropia advantageously generated 30 degrees of right visual field...

CONCLUSIONS: Improved pointing accuracy for stimuli detected in prism-expanded vision of patients with hemianopia wearing 57Δ oblique p-prisms is possible and training appears to further improve detection.

CONCLUSIONS: Left neglect was associated with rightward asymmetry in collision judgments, which may cause collisions on the left side even when an obstacle is detected. These behaviors may represent the spatial misperceptions in body midline described previously in patients with left neglect.

CONCLUSIONS: Comfortable and effective restoration of eye opening with maintenance of the blink is feasible using external static magnets and warrants further study.